![]() ![]() They differ, again, in their length: for Tragedy endeavours, as far as possible, to confine itself to a single revolution of the sun, or but slightly to exceed this limit whereas the Epic action has no limits of time. ![]() They differ, in that Epic poetry admits but one kind of metre, and is narrative in form. His only reference to the time in the fictive world is in a distinction between the epic and tragic forms:Įpic poetry agrees with Tragedy in so far as it is an imitation in verse of characters of a higher type. For a thing whose presence or absence makes no visible difference, is not an organic part of the whole. ![]() Now, according to our definition, Tragedy is an imitation of an action that is complete, and whole, and of a certain magnitude … As therefore, in the other imitative arts, the imitation is one when the object imitated is one, so the plot, being an imitation of an action, must imitate one action and that a whole, the structural union of the parts being such that, if any one of them is displaced or removed, the whole will be disjointed and disturbed. Aristotle dealt with the unity of action in some detail, under the general subject of "definition of tragedy", where he wrote: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |